The DU Lounge
In reply to the discussion: Name a bad movie that was adapted from a good novel [View all]Midwestern Democrat
(1,029 posts)filming began and Paul Newman took over the direction (and Newman, as great as he was an actor, did not really have any particular skill at directing - his directorial debut "Rachel, Rachel" got a lot of praise in 1968, but he never came close to repeating that success in the few attempts he made at directing after that - his primary motivation for directing seemed to be providing Joanne Woodward acting showcases). This kind of puzzles me - a book of that pedigree; Hollywood's biggest star (only McQueen was Newman's equal) in the starring role; a cast including Henry Fonda and Lee Remick - and they penny pinch on the director? They don't try to get someone at the level of a Martin Ritt or a Sidney Lumet? They get a guy who was directing episodes of "Ironside"?