Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The DU Lounge

GoCubsGo

(34,981 posts)

6. I don't know if they are any easier to catch in this stage.

Reply to a kennedy (Original post)

Mon Jul 9, 2012, 02:14 PM

Jul 2012

I suppose that if they consider the lobster pot to be a good shelter, then maybe so. They are certainly more vulnerable, as their carapace protects them from many predators. They usually seek some sort of shelter until they harden up. That being said, lobsters are usually caught in traps. And, there are limits to the size and number that can be trapped. Whether or not they are soft-shelled when caught probably won't make any difference regarding their populations, if that is what you are wondering.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

soft shell lobster....are they a good thing?? [View all] a kennedy Jul 2012 OP

They're cheap this year! bluedigger Jul 2012 #1

the lobstermen around here Maine-ah Jul 2012 #5

I've eaten soft-shell crabs. I don't see any reason why lobster would be much different. HopeHoops Jul 2012 #2

They are amazing dr.strangelove Jul 2012 #3

Any lobster is a good thing. n/t RebelOne Jul 2012 #4

I don't know if they are any easier to catch in this stage. GoCubsGo Jul 2012 #6