Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The DU Lounge

MarineCombatEngineer

(18,192 posts)

4. Yup.

Reply to Oeditpus Rex (Reply #3)

Sat Sep 6, 2025, 11:49 PM

Sep 2025

Last edited Sun Sep 7, 2025, 12:32 AM - Edit history (1)

The '56 was definitely unique in it's fuel tank filler design, along with the others you described.
You just don't see that kind of uniqueness anymore what with the mass production these days.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

ultralite001

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just a tech. ? for gearheads, [View all] MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2025 OP

Raises hand (nt) amerikat Sep 2025 #1

(Points at hand) MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2025 #2

Drivers side rear tail light. amerikat Sep 2025 #9

Drivers side read tail light . amerikat Sep 2025 #10

Yupyup Oeditpus Rex Sep 2025 #3

Yup. MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2025 #4

The fuel neck on my '66 Bel Air wasn't nearly so cool Oeditpus Rex Sep 2025 #13

Same way on my '72 Chevy Nova. LudwigPastorius Sep 2025 #14

What if you had? Oeditpus Rex Sep 2025 #15

Probably wouldn't meet modern crash standards MichMan Sep 2025 #5

LOL, MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2025 #6

I meant the fuel filler placement, not the entire car MichMan Sep 2025 #7

Well, you are certainly right about that, MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2025 #8

Since I pumped gas in the 1960's, I think I could find it... Wounded Bear Sep 2025 #11

As did I, MarineCombatEngineer Sep 2025 #12

They Aren't Service Stations Anymore ProfessorGAC Sep 2025 #16