Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Orrex

(66,954 posts)
20. To be fair, they seldom target films so specifically
Thu Dec 27, 2012, 01:15 PM
Dec 2012

I can't remember the last movie that was marketed toward far-sighted, left handed jugglers who work in customer service, yet somehow I manage to find films that are entertaining. Worse, when they do portray far-sighted, left handed jugglers who work in customer service, they invariably get it wrong in some preposterous way,

At the risk of sermonizing, fiction is a synthesis of reality and not a 100% faithful recreation of it. If the end product is engaging and entertaining, then it's a success. If it misses the mark in some critical way, then it's a failure, though it might still score big at the box office.


Regarding the Bond films, they are not all created equal. Some are almost entirely unwatchable, but others are quite good. I won't say that you need to roll the dice on another, but bear in mind that you may have picked a lemon.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why are they remaking Robocop? [View all] jmowreader Dec 2012 OP
I liked the first one siligut Dec 2012 #1
I'd buy that for a dollar! Grantuspeace Dec 2012 #5
I loved Supper Man Orrex Dec 2012 #14
For the same reason they... LP2K12 Dec 2012 #2
Well that and a TM99 Dec 2012 #3
Exactly! LP2K12 Dec 2012 #4
And they better release the thing in its original form! jmowreader Dec 2012 #16
Exactly. geardaddy Dec 2012 #11
You mean for the same reason that Arthur Conan Doyle wrote more than one Holmes story? Orrex Dec 2012 #15
That's a big if there, Orrex jmowreader Dec 2012 #18
The remake of The Fly is better than the original. Orrex Dec 2012 #21
Ok, simple question TM99 Dec 2012 #29
Well... TM99 Dec 2012 #28
When it comes to their movies, Americans hate change. HughBeaumont Dec 2012 #6
Still waiting for the big-budget remake of 'Avatar'; LeftinOH Dec 2012 #7
Nah... LP2K12 Dec 2012 #8
Yeah. And tip: This time, don't sink the ship! Aristus Dec 2012 #9
Wouldn't that be the mythology Dec 2012 #10
You'd have to kentauros Dec 2012 #32
First one was a classic, worthy of a remake JPZenger Dec 2012 #12
The third was worse than the second jmowreader Dec 2012 #13
I agree. Especially if the film series is about a British spy. Orrex Dec 2012 #17
I got about halfway through one of those movies and left jmowreader Dec 2012 #19
To be fair, they seldom target films so specifically Orrex Dec 2012 #20
All Bond films have the same problem jmowreader Dec 2012 #25
True Lies? Really? Orrex Dec 2012 #26
$$$$ TeamPooka Dec 2012 #22
Same reason they do any remake - Money. MicaelS Dec 2012 #23
In Defense of Hollywood... Yavin4 Dec 2012 #24
They should just re-release the original. CJCRANE Dec 2012 #27
As long as they don't make it 3-d, I'm with you jmowreader Dec 2012 #30
Because the bean-counters rule Holywood, now. Odin2005 Dec 2012 #31
i know, right? datasuspect Dec 2012 #33
Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Why are they remaking Rob...»Reply #20