Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The DU Lounge

In reply to the discussion: Views on eyeglass styles [View all]
 

talkingmime

(2,173 posts)
62. I always used Epson for dot matrix, Brother for typewriters, and HP for printers.
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 08:36 PM
Mar 2013

I've used a lot of different computers, but HP has the best price-performance ratio on the market right now. Regardless of the brand, don't buy one from Best Buy or other such stores. The stuff they sell is at least six months old. It's more cost effective to configure one online from the manufacturer and have it shipped directly to your home. I also like the feel of the HP keyboards and touch pads better than any other make.

I still have the original IBM think pad laptop (B&W) with the nipple in the keyboard and would buy another except that they sold the naming rights to Lenova and their keyboards and nipple mouses aren't even close to the quality of the IBM machines. Unfortunate development. Actually, I've got a color one too, but it's a few years newer.

I've worked with Brother printers and always found them to be a pain in the ass. The typewriters are great (if they still make them) and on the quality level of a Selectric, but the printers jammed all the time and I wasn't impressed with the prints. Lots of "butt smears" as we used to call them back in the day.

Pretty much all of the ink jets use independent print heads and ink cartridges now. The 8000 lets you replace the print heads, but they've got a service life of like eleventy million pages. The ink, not so much. Fitting three printers into my already tight work space isn't easy, but they all serve their own purposes. It involves shelving. The ink jet is wireless, as is the multi-function, but with multiple young adults in the house the router is often hammered to the point where I expect it to flee out the front door in terror. The Internet light on the DSL modem is almost solid when they're here.

The two laser jets are hard-wired as backups. If I need to print a hundred or so pages I always use one of the laser jets. They're fast enough to make a difference and I don't need double-sided because I use the clean side for editing notes. Those binder rings are perfect for the job. I don't buy 3-hole punched paper. I figured out many years ago that it was cheaper to buy a 20-sheet puncher than it was to spend the extra on paper that just went through a triple drill press.

I've still got one of the original HP Office Jet multi-function printers (black and white, parallel port) and sometimes pull it out for the older machines without USB ports. It has a problem with pulling in more than one sheet of paper at a time, but just feeding it one at a time takes care of that. Again, long past its service life. It has to be twenty years old by now.

I don't discard anything that still works. There's too much electronic waste (along with a multitude of other kinds) as it is. If it is still working I keep it working. I'm the same way with cars. I drive them until they're seriously out of commission. I just sunk $5,000 into a 1993 and a 2000 to bring them up to inspection level. It's worth it. You can't buy a good used car for $5,000 and I kept two alive with that amount. They're both good cars.

I scavenge computers on trash day. Some of the parts are hard to find, like the CD and floppy drives in particular. The power supplies almost always work and the housings are huge by today's standards. It is a cheap way to get equipment. Sometimes I even score a motherboard with memory!!! I've got about 15 CRT monitors in the basement so I just go for the boxes now. I've even found some that just boot!

Some of them are 386 boxes, but mostly I find Pentiums and occasionally a multi-core. Still, I'm mostly interested in the power supply, case, memory, and drives. I can put whatever operating system I want on them. Linux runs fine on a 386. If I don't rescue them, they just end up in the incinerator. That's a waste and an environmental tragedy. The metal I don't use goes to the recycling center (doesn't pay much, but I take it over anyway). I reuse or recycle any and everything possible. It's part of my code of ethics.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Views on eyeglass styles [View all] BainsBane Mar 2013 OP
what are the 80s styles? OriginalGeek Mar 2013 #1
bigger lenses BainsBane Mar 2013 #2
Not nuts about the look but as a multifocal wearer I expect they're great. nolabear Mar 2013 #3
I have to buy new glasses this weekend BainsBane Mar 2013 #4
If you have never bought eyeglasses online... MicaelS Mar 2013 #15
Zenni has been good for me. Graybeard Mar 2013 #27
I've bought from Warby Parker and have loved them! Agschmid Mar 2013 #28
Ohhh, meh OriginalGeek Mar 2013 #5
i dont like them. i know they are popular, but i do not think a good frame on any face. nt seabeyond Mar 2013 #50
I wear the biggest lenses possible in metal frames with the springy things in the folding part. talkingmime Mar 2013 #6
I agree with you - I hate having the little lenses framing my view csziggy Mar 2013 #16
Well don't bother with Pearl or Lenscrafters. They don't have any large frames. talkingmime Mar 2013 #17
I've been going to a local chain csziggy Mar 2013 #18
I have to use bifocals. I haven't seen half-frames in forever, but I do remember them. talkingmime Mar 2013 #19
I have bifocals for the computer csziggy Mar 2013 #20
I can use my bifocals on the computer if I tip my head back in nose-bleed position. talkingmime Mar 2013 #21
Have you thought about the no line ones BainsBane Mar 2013 #22
I've thought about transitionals, but I sort of like the line to clue me in as to focal distance. talkingmime Mar 2013 #23
Be careful with that tilting csziggy Mar 2013 #31
I know I shouldn't but nolabear Mar 2013 #36
Oh, we all gave Dad a hard time about it csziggy Mar 2013 #41
I'm a heavy multi-tasker. There are generally three, sometimes four monitors on. talkingmime Mar 2013 #46
I love my computer bifocals! csziggy Mar 2013 #51
I've thought of getting transitional trifocals to handle the job - distance monitors, close, reading talkingmime Mar 2013 #53
Transitionals wouldn't work for me csziggy Mar 2013 #55
I like the line so I can distinguish, but I'm willing to give transitionals a try. talkingmime Mar 2013 #56
Yes - I had dual monitors for a while when I was playing around csziggy Mar 2013 #57
I've got a really powerful box with the two monitors I mentioned and a laptop in use at all times. talkingmime Mar 2013 #58
I no longer shoot for high powered csziggy Mar 2013 #59
The multi-function ones have served me well. I only buy HP, mostly for reliability. talkingmime Mar 2013 #60
Maybe the multifunction drivers have gotten better csziggy Mar 2013 #61
I always used Epson for dot matrix, Brother for typewriters, and HP for printers. talkingmime Mar 2013 #62
I agree with the HP printers being cost effective csziggy Mar 2013 #63
HP's moving toward pure-ink cartridges (hold more than the head in cartridge kinds). talkingmime Mar 2013 #66
I know I use more cyan than any other color csziggy Mar 2013 #70
They're called "spring temples", just so ya know. SPN* trof Mar 2013 #29
Thank you. I couldn't think of the term. talkingmime Mar 2013 #45
Jeeez I hated those. I was always breaking the frames, usually playing basketball. Hoyt Mar 2013 #76
Gosh, that style is unbecoming imo. Helen Reddy Mar 2013 #7
you haven't seen them around? BainsBane Mar 2013 #11
Besides, Helen Reddy Mar 2013 #8
What do I think? Ew. Bertha Venation Mar 2013 #9
me too BainsBane Mar 2013 #10
I still have mine from the 80's. progressoid Mar 2013 #12
I have a pair of hipster Ray Ban glasses tammywammy Mar 2013 #13
i had a pair that weighed at least five pounds. awful memories of junior high. just awful. backtoblue Mar 2013 #14
The ones I got in November are a bit larger, kcass1954 Mar 2013 #24
those look nice BainsBane Mar 2013 #25
Oh I know, and I didn't like them any better in the 80s than I do now. kcass1954 Mar 2013 #26
Zenni Optical and goggles4U are both good websites. Manifestor_of_Light Mar 2013 #30
did you use a picture BainsBane Mar 2013 #35
No. Manifestor_of_Light Mar 2013 #37
I need sturdy glasses BainsBane Mar 2013 #39
I have to get plastic too. Lenses and frames. Manifestor_of_Light Mar 2013 #42
when you order online BainsBane Mar 2013 #48
My prescription did not give the pupil distance Digit Mar 2013 #71
Thanks BainsBane Mar 2013 #72
I wear readers, which are small for a reason. But large glasses are more flattering Honeycombe8 Mar 2013 #32
I prefer rectangular shaped glasses BainsBane Mar 2013 #33
Square or rectangle, yes, is what I meant. Just not round or oval. nt Honeycombe8 Mar 2013 #34
Do you need anything different BainsBane Mar 2013 #43
I wear readers. No prescription. I buy them at discount stores. Honeycombe8 Mar 2013 #47
sorry BainsBane Mar 2013 #49
Don't know about the 80's... triguy46 Mar 2013 #38
those are the 80s style BainsBane Mar 2013 #40
I really like those! n/t kurtzapril4 Mar 2013 #52
I'll wear any kind that's comfortable on the nose RILib Mar 2013 #44
I once wanted to try on round frames such as Joseph Kennedy and James Joyce wore: hedgehog Mar 2013 #54
I had a pair of those, but I lost them. hunter Mar 2013 #64
I just ordered TuxedoKat Mar 2013 #65
PIc of SO's daughter walking in Manhattan from Books&Liquor blog... HereSince1628 Mar 2013 #67
They look nice on her! BainsBane Mar 2013 #68
Certainly evidence of BIG lenses on glasses HereSince1628 Mar 2013 #69
Classic cashmere coat there!!! Classy!!! Manifestor_of_Light Mar 2013 #73
Swifty sez mockmonkey Mar 2013 #74
I was just looking at some like that on Zenni Optical BainsBane Mar 2013 #75
Brett Somers mockmonkey Mar 2013 #77
Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Views on eyeglass styles»Reply #62