Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The DU Lounge

Avalux

(35,015 posts)

2. Maybe because Bernini's is 'covered'.

Reply to intaglio (Original post)

Sat May 3, 2014, 11:17 AM

May 2014

I prefer this one too - the face, the expression, the body in motion; I find it the most pleasing. This is the David I'd want in my corner (and maybe somewhere else, teehee).

But he's not completely nude. Maybe that's why it wasn't popular at the time??

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ok, so I posted about US/European art appreciation in a Lounge style and [View all] intaglio May 2014 OP

Three Davids rrneck May 2014 #1

Maybe because Bernini's is 'covered'. Avalux May 2014 #2

Given that many of the classical nude statues were, really, upper class porn intaglio May 2014 #3

and Donatello's: elleng May 2014 #4

I've only just noticed intaglio May 2014 #5

Uh, that's the way they come--factory fresh, I understand. Manifestor_of_Light May 2014 #6