Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

battleknight24

(1,165 posts)
2. I see what you mean... but...
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 04:46 AM
Aug 2014

I see what you mean about the pattern repeating itself... in theory there can be an infinite number of strikeouts in one inning.

But isn't the scenario in the last few steps possible (though extremely improbable) due to the fourth out rule?

" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_out "

Forgetting the meaningless out at second base in the above scenario, since failure to tag out is not a force out, and the runner scored before the right fielder threw the ball to first for the "first" third out, the fielders would need to throw the ball to third to cancel the run. They throw the ball to third, which cancels the run, and the previous third out is nullified.

For a question that might have a definite numerical answer:

Is it possible for an inning to have seven or eight theoretical outs in one inning with no runs scored?

Summarized from the above scenario: 3 dropped third strike strikeouts, strikeout (4), fly ball caught (5), throw to 1st for runner that failed to tag up (6), throw to 2nd for runner that failed to tag up (7), throw to third for runner that failed to tag up, which also cancels the run that scored (8th theoretical out, 3rd real out, which canceled the previous two "third outs&quot .

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Baseball fans - Is it pos...»Reply #2