Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The DU Lounge

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)

6. In my experience, 3 is no-more difficult than 2,

Reply to UTUSN (Original post)

Sun Mar 8, 2015, 10:22 PM

Mar 2015

and they were big dogs (2 shepherds and a rottweiler). But if the 15 year commitment is a real consideration, than that's what I'd base the decision upon.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Am asking: Have got 2 little dogs, am offered 1, *should* I?!1 [View all] UTUSN Mar 2015 OP

What is it? femmocrat Mar 2015 #1

Well, I *can* take care of it, *do* I want to take it on? What's your limit? n/t UTUSN Mar 2015 #2

I have three dogs. That is my limit. femmocrat Mar 2015 #3

It's a baby. Wow/Corgis!1 Well, THREE is your limit & I've got TWO so it's a GO!1 n/t UTUSN Mar 2015 #4

Wow! But I bet you were going to do that anyhow! ;) femmocrat Mar 2015 #5

In my experience, 3 is no-more difficult than 2, Joe Shlabotnik Mar 2015 #6

I would say if you are thinking of another one, get a senior! Arugula Latte Mar 2015 #7

+1 Joe Shlabotnik Mar 2015 #8

We're a three dog family and it's no more difficult than two riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #9