Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
In reply to the discussion: Another employment rejection. [View all]Major Nikon
(36,927 posts)6. It's better to consider promotion potential rather than starting pay
A job with a good starting pay, but no potential to earn more is worse long term than a job that starts low, but has good opportunities for advancement.
Few companies are going to risk much on new hires. You just never know what you're going to get. Someone who looks good on paper may be a dud and vice versa.
Even if the starting pay is low, experience in the field you want also has value if most others are making good money.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There is a school of thought about getting a job that goes like this;
Dyedinthewoolliberal
May 2015
#58