Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The DU Lounge

CaliforniaPeggy

(156,432 posts)

3. My dear malthaussen!

Reply to malthaussen (Original post)

Mon Sep 7, 2015, 10:35 AM

Sep 2015

I would say they were both beautiful, in their own unique ways. NOT comparable at all...

Grace Kelly was glamorous, a classic sleek beauty, while Audrey Hepburn was more pixie-ish...I can't really think of any words to describe how she differs from Grace Kelly.

But they sure as hell were both beautiful.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Grace Kelly beats Audrey Hepburn? [View all] malthaussen Sep 2015 OP

No! PennyK Sep 2015 #1

Don't visit that place where the link goes Paulie Sep 2015 #2

My dear malthaussen! CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2015 #3

I would agree bigwillq Sep 2015 #4

I'll take Audrey for the eyes and smile. n/t malthaussen Sep 2015 #5

They were both quite beautiful, Audrey had the opportunity to do mackerel Sep 2015 #6

They were both beautiful both inside and out. IrishEyes Sep 2015 #7

Not. A. Chance. In. Hell. hifiguy Sep 2015 #8

. BlueJazz Sep 2015 #9

But didn't Hepburn have kind of a Funny Face? betsuni Sep 2015 #10