Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The DU Lounge

amerikat

(5,240 posts)

11. Our site administrator interprets it this way.

Reply to malthaussen (Reply #9)

Sat Apr 16, 2016, 07:38 AM

Apr 2016

Not sure if HR or legal interprets it that way. I'll ask for clarification from higher up the food chain.

I believe I can do this anonymously through a third party provided by the company. They offer help
in issues such as drug abuse, tax problems, legal stuff.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Can the lounge please check my logic? [View all] amerikat Apr 2016 OP

The calendar year is Jan 1 to Dec 31. amerikat Apr 2016 #1

2015 is "currently" Turbineguy Apr 2016 #2

It's only 28 hours. amerikat Apr 2016 #3

Your logic may be correct but I don't know why their policy would allow it... Phentex Apr 2016 #8

The problem is with how they've phrased the policy discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2016 #4

I get 80 hours vacation. so up to 40 can be carried. i'm only asking for the 28 hours amerikat Apr 2016 #5

I have to get some sleep before work. I'll check back in before amerikat Apr 2016 #6

You can explain your view regarding the phrases containing the words "next" and "following". discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2016 #7

They use a payroll company. amerikat Apr 2016 #10

Vacation usually has a process associated with it. discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2016 #12

Yes all vacation requests are made thru the third party payroll site. amerikat Apr 2016 #13

good discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2016 #14

It is ambiguous as written... malthaussen Apr 2016 #9

Our site administrator interprets it this way. amerikat Apr 2016 #11