Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
In reply to the discussion: Best 65-75 muscle car. Not necessarily power, just best. [View all]OffWithTheirHeads
(10,337 posts)34. First, it has a trunk. Throw the groceries and one of the kids in the trunk
Put the other kid in the passanger seat and then tell me that the kids wouldn't love to show up at the ballgame in that! Second, if a 427 isn't muscle, what is? A 1,000 hp Porsche Can-Am car?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
First, it has a trunk. Throw the groceries and one of the kids in the trunk
OffWithTheirHeads
Mar 2012
#34
You wish. The 427 SC has well over 500 horsepower - today's "vintage" 289's are well over 400.
Mopar151
Mar 2012
#42
To me, they're all "fixer uppers" I can't think of 1 that is the whole package.
Mopar151
Mar 2012
#15
I'm with ya, but I go for the 1966 version of the GTO, just for the taillights.
GReedDiamond
Mar 2012
#43
Interesting. I have the same reaction when I watch Antiques Roadshow.
OffWithTheirHeads
Mar 2012
#36