Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
In reply to the discussion: Best 65-75 muscle car. Not necessarily power, just best. [View all]GReedDiamond
(5,549 posts)43. I'm with ya, but I go for the 1966 version of the GTO, just for the taillights.

1965 GTO

1966 GTO
Plus, the '66 GTO is more aerodynamically swooped than the '65, and it has a much more aggressive looking profile...

1965 GTO

1966 GTO
THAT SAID, I'd eat a bug (sorry for the Cal Worthington reference) for a pristine, vintage version of either!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
First, it has a trunk. Throw the groceries and one of the kids in the trunk
OffWithTheirHeads
Mar 2012
#34
You wish. The 427 SC has well over 500 horsepower - today's "vintage" 289's are well over 400.
Mopar151
Mar 2012
#42
To me, they're all "fixer uppers" I can't think of 1 that is the whole package.
Mopar151
Mar 2012
#15
I'm with ya, but I go for the 1966 version of the GTO, just for the taillights.
GReedDiamond
Mar 2012
#43
Interesting. I have the same reaction when I watch Antiques Roadshow.
OffWithTheirHeads
Mar 2012
#36