Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
7. these are good points. what I had in mind is people would nominate a site with a comment as a fake
Mon Mar 27, 2017, 08:12 PM
Mar 2017

news site .. and then include evidence and supporting arguments. For many the supporting argument would be a legitimate article from a known news/analysis site which makes the argument that the site is a purveyor of fake news.

Then each nominated site, with evidence/argument would be considered by each DU member as Fake news or not based on their own evaluation of the evidence. Each person reading the comment could comment in the affirmative or in opposition as they felt moved to.

I guess you could say it's a less formal, or less structured way of accomplishing what you outlined.



Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Propaganda Debunking»Fake news sites: a listin...»Reply #7