Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

truth2power

(8,219 posts)
12. Well, I'll post the link, because unlike some who claim to be progressives on this site...
Thu May 2, 2013, 05:54 PM
May 2013

I actually watched the interview. I am not a fan of Alex Jones. But I'm not AFRAID of him, either.

Here's Sibel's website:

http://boilingfrogspost.com

And here's a link to the interview in question. The interviewer is David Knight. With this link the interview with her starts about one hour in. It should go to that point automatically when you click on the video. As to jones taking a "vacation" in the middle of the program, as has been stated in another post, I have seen many videos where more than one interviewer appears on the same show.

http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2013/04/30/sibel-edmonds-on-operation-gladio-graham-fuller-boston-terror-the-great-game/

Here's another link to her "hypotheses" (her word) as to what's going on in the background.

http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2013/05/01/bfp-boston-terror-update-4-the-backdoor-deal-needed-face-saving-ingredient-for-russia-on-syria/

Sibel speaking:

In my April 22 interview for Boiling Frogs Post EyeOpener Report I provided three possible US objectives associated with the Boston Terror incident. I emphasized the first possible scenario as the most likely: Removing Russia as the obstacle in invading Syria. I pointed out that to achieve this objective a back-door deal could have been struck with Russia. What sort of a deal? Here is what I hypothesized:

1-Our Back-Door Deal with Russia on Syria: Our soon-to-come Invasion of Syria immediately following the Boston Terror incident with Russia removing itself as an obstacle

2-Rise in “Radical Islamic Terror” in Russia’s Caucasus-mainly in the Chechnya and Dagestan region

3-Per Washington’s consent a major Russian crack-down in the Caucasus- US-Western governments support attributing this to Russia’s contribution in countering Global Islamic Terrorism

In my analyses of Boston Terror-CIA-Syria-Caucasus & Central Asia connections I have been emphasizing the need of a ‘Face-Saving’ ingredient for Russia in implementing its back-door deal with the United States. With the US placing the Caucasus and Central Asia on the map as the new hot-bed of radical terrorists and Russia’s ‘needed’ role in cracking down on the factions in the region, and with creating the face-saving scenario for Russia on its support of Syria.


I am detecting a pattern here on DU regarding discussion of the Boston bombing; a frantic effort to SHUT IT DOWN tighter than Ft. Knox. I wonder why?

If one goes to other progressive sites on the internet, questions are freely asked. Here's my ongoing, hastily sketched list:

Chris Floyd
Dave Lindorf - Smirking Chimp
Common Dreams - Articles & comments
Counterpunch
Alternet - Steven Rosenfield (4/26/13) "9 Burning Questions..."
Daniel Hopsicker - Article on Uncle Ruslan
Dmitry Orlov - "...it appeared that somebody was hastily concocting a story for public consumption"
Michael Chossodovsky - Boston Truth: The Chechen Connection

I thought the mark of someone capable of higher order thinking skills was to be able to analyze and synthesize information from various sources in order to come to a reasoned conclusion.

Interesting that all I hear is "Alex Jones...Booga booga!!!"

who stands to lose from talking about this? What are they afraid of?


P.S. I missed this thread last week. Otherwise I would have posted earlier.







Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Whistleblowers»Sibel Edmonds today on Al...»Reply #12