Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
8. Don't disagree at all, BUT.........
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 11:02 AM
Feb 2012

What you describe is one of the weaknesses of "Trade Unionism". It doesn't promote the entire working class or cross trade solidarity. It's usually just representing one trade. That's why I like the Wobbly model. It DOES cut across trade lines and posit one big union for all. I would assume that middle and line management would be included IF they sided with the workers rather than the bosses.

But that is the problem in a lot of these cases. The ones who are classed as "management" buy into the company line wholeheartedly and DON'T side with the workers and, as Trotsky said, "A worker in the service of the capitalists is not a worker, but instead is a bourgeoisie cop."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

401K Fraud TheMastersNemesis Feb 2012 #1
This is garbage. limpyhobbler Feb 2012 #2
I'm suprsied the UAW isn't fighting this harder. white_wolf Feb 2012 #3
It's for the salaried workers, NOT the line workers........... socialist_n_TN Feb 2012 #5
Well, I guess my next question is... white_wolf Feb 2012 #6
They are workers too in my book - TBF Feb 2012 #7
Don't disagree at all, BUT......... socialist_n_TN Feb 2012 #8
Totally agreed: Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #4
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»GM to move all salaried w...»Reply #8