Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Socialist Progressives

(6,670 posts)

1. Given DU's anti-Chavez bias, I'm betting on "thugs", but it's what we're going to have to do or fail

Sun Apr 29, 2012, 11:47 AM

Apr 2012

Fantatically one-sided article, though. It's hard to tell anything from it

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What do y'all think? Is this the modern day equivalent........... [View all] socialist_n_TN Apr 2012 OP

"Fanatically one-sided article..."........ socialist_n_TN Apr 2012 #4

Wow, slanted at all? Scuba Apr 2012 #2

Oh yeah, DEFINITELY biased.......... socialist_n_TN Apr 2012 #3

Given Chavez's current medical condition I think he TBF Apr 2012 #5

And help for the working class is what a worker's militia......... socialist_n_TN Apr 2012 #8

They have a Facebook page. Starry Messenger Apr 2012 #6

As noted in posts above, the sheer bias in this article.......... socialist_n_TN Apr 2012 #7

I'm glad you posted it, it's got me curious too. :) Starry Messenger Apr 2012 #10

That's not an article... ret5hd Apr 2012 #9

No argument from me. HOWEVER.......... socialist_n_TN Apr 2012 #11

Well that was some shoddy "Journalism" Hearst would be proud. white_wolf Apr 2012 #12

washingtonpost.com carried a longer version of the article limpyhobbler Apr 2012 #13

Yeah, I noticed on their facebook page......... socialist_n_TN Apr 2012 #14