Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Starry Messenger

(32,380 posts)
2. I think the theory gets applied dogmatically because people neglect materialism.
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 09:12 AM
Jun 2012

Actual materialism, where current events and forces are looked at. It is good to examine history, but trying to apply the solutions of one phase of history to the now doesn't make any sense. As you say "We are in a new century, a new era with new problems and we need new solutions."

Things are always shifting. Marx and Lenin wrote a lot about this too, I'm not sure why some Marxists skip over the "practicum" part of their respective works. I read other socialist boards too and the arguing reminds me of DC vs. Marvel flamewars on fandom boards.

*We* are the modern theorists. I think those of us on DU realize that the current government of the US is a factor in what we need to consider, and that it is important not to neglect the electoral arena. That gives us a leg-up from armchair philosophy already, imo. How can we build from there?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»"If you meet Marx on...»Reply #2