Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Starry Messenger

(32,380 posts)
8. I've never read anything on this topic.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 06:53 PM
Jul 2012

But I work in a field that is more or less "centrally planned"--our public school system.

We have computers. Some things are more efficient, but other things are horrible with them. I think computers can be like that old cliche', when all you have is a hammer, all your problems look like a nail. Issues should be evaluated on the basis of what they truly need and it just shouldn't be assumed that anything can be fixed if you just throw more computers at it.

(Note: I'm not a technophobe. I lurve the internet and have a smartphone and do social media to the extent that I can, considering that I'm aging out of the demographic most of these things are aimed at.)

I think the best thing that computers are for in a centrally planned system are better ordering and inventory control via scanning bar-code systems. I think they would be good for conferences and communication too, but it would be necessary to get all regions up to an excellent standard with uniform quality.

edit to add: I think the idea that a centrally planned economy was inefficient under socialism isn't really true anyway. I don't have numbers at my fingers, but I doubt that many of the troubles any of them encountered was from central planning.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»Economic Planning and Com...»Reply #8