Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

supernova

(39,346 posts)
2. Great article
Thu Aug 9, 2012, 09:46 AM
Aug 2012

Thanks for posting it, white-wolf.

I think, what it shows more than anything how much they appreciated the idea that up and down the social ladder, they all depended upon each other for survival. The peasant couldn't survive without land for subsistence farming and protection from the local Lord. The Lord in turn, couldn't survive without peasants to work the estate and provide services in the towns that sprang up around the estate.

We have gotten away from that idea of appreciating that everyone has a part to play in our lives.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sounds very interesting. silverweb Aug 2012 #1
Great article supernova Aug 2012 #2
Good little read TheKentuckian Aug 2012 #3
I think you used to see the same kind of dynamic in small towns. You couldn't be mean to HiPointDem Aug 2012 #4
... limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #5
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»Greed was different in th...»Reply #2