Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
4. I think you used to see the same kind of dynamic in small towns. You couldn't be mean to
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:16 AM
Aug 2012

people because there were so many interconnections and dependencies, you had to make the effort to be fair.

I think it's not so much people's view of money & wealth, but that in a smaller-scale society the zero-sum nature of wealth is easier to see -- how A got rich by stealing from B, etc. -- and power is more balanced. B could rally his relatives and friends and murder A in his bed, stop laboring in A's fields, etc.

Old-time mores used to include not bragging or displaying wealth conspicuously, not complimenting people on possessions -- all I suspect evolved to keep envy to a minimum & maintain social harmony. Thus modesty was a virtue. Nowadays we're counseled the opposite -- to "advertise our brand" -- though most people still don't like a conspicuous braggart. But envy-inciting display of wealth & status is ubiquitous.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sounds very interesting. silverweb Aug 2012 #1
Great article supernova Aug 2012 #2
Good little read TheKentuckian Aug 2012 #3
I think you used to see the same kind of dynamic in small towns. You couldn't be mean to HiPointDem Aug 2012 #4
... limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #5
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»Greed was different in th...»Reply #4