but I ended up reading him anyway. His Vanity Fair articles were usually really bitingly funny, even when I disagreed with him. The one he wrote last year to first reveal he was dying of cancer made me cry when I first read it. .
http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2010/09/hitchens-201009
The notorious stage theory of Elisabeth Kübler-Ross, whereby one progresses from denial to rage through bargaining to depression and the eventual bliss of acceptance, hasnt so far had much application in my case. In one way, I suppose, I have been in denial for some time, knowingly burning the candle at both ends and finding that it often gives a lovely light. But for precisely that reason, I cant see myself smiting my brow with shock or hear myself whining about how its all so unfair: I have been taunting the Reaper into taking a free scythe in my direction and have now succumbed to something so predictable and banal that it bores even me. Rage would be beside the point for the same reason. Instead, I am badly oppressed by a gnawing sense of waste. I had real plans for my next decade and felt Id worked hard enough to earn it. Will I really not live to see my children married? To watch the World Trade Center rise again? To readif not indeed writethe obituaries of elderly villains like Henry Kissinger and Joseph Ratzinger? But I understand this sort of non-thinking for what it is: sentimentality and self-pity. Of course my book hit the best-seller list on the day that I received the grimmest of news bulletins, and for that matter the last flight I took as a healthy-feeling person (to a fine, big audience at the Chicago Book Fair) was the one that made me a million-miler on United Airlines, with a lifetime of free upgrades to look forward to. But irony is my business and I just cant see any ironies here: would it be less poignant to get cancer on the day that my memoirs were remaindered as a box-office turkey, or that I was bounced from a coach-class flight and left on the tarmac? To the dumb question Why me? the cosmos barely bothers to return the reply: Why not?