Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
2. It wasn't always that way.
Sun Apr 27, 2014, 11:40 PM
Apr 2014
http://www.arl.org/focus-areas/copyright-ip/2486-copyright-timeline

The 1710 act established the principles of authors' ownership of copyright and a fixed term of protection of copyrighted works (fourteen years, and renewable for fourteen more if the author was alive upon expiration). The statute prevented a monopoly on the part of the booksellers and created a "public domain" for literature by limiting terms of copyright and by ensuring that once a work was purchased the copyright owner no longer had control over its use.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Copyright is theft. joshcryer Apr 2014 #1
It wasn't always that way. bananas Apr 2014 #2
I accept no "protection period." joshcryer Apr 2014 #3
Current copyright law is insane. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2014 #4
Abso--fuckin--lutely. Jackpine Radical Apr 2014 #5
They are not claiming copyright on all of Marx and Engels works. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2014 #6
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»Should Marx and Engels be...»Reply #2