Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
16. This reads like a bloodthirsty Neo-Con rant, to me.
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 10:09 AM
Apr 2014

I have deep criticisms of our U.S. foreign policies and geopolitical machinations, but I don't see it from this writers perspective at all.


A Succession of Failures and Concessions

The Arab revolutions, supported by Washington, foundered with the sole exception of Tunisia. The United States will have seen in passing their Egyptian, Saudi, Turkish and Israeli allies distancing themselves or turning their backs on them. And what to say of their mistakes and of their impotence, finally, regarding the torturer of Damascus, Bashar Assad, in spite of their proclaimed will to see him leave office? And of the announced “red line” regarding the use of chemical weapons against its civic population? There has been more saber rattling and constant concessions regarding the Iranian nuclear program. The difficult negotiations in progress in Geneva should allow an agreement of frontage with Tehran, and the end of economic sanctions against a control of the Iranian nuclear sites because the White House wants an absolute success. But it will simply be a facade without the dismantling of the Islamic republic's secret military program of nuclear armaments. Since the beginning, the parties involved in the negotiations have acted as if it didn't exist.



As an aside, I tried to figure who this "Watching America" organization was, impossible from it's website, claims to be "neutral" when obviously it isn't. I noticed a "Blue Republican" logo sponsor which I've never heard of before. I suspect it's a Neo-Conservative organization.. or tied to that milieu of Neo Cons tied the Foreign Relations Council etc. Could be wrong.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"Translated By Simon Wood". From what? Russian? Tarheel_Dem Apr 2014 #1
From Slate (France) - are you having trouble reading today? TBF Apr 2014 #2
Block me. Sounds like you guys need "protecting". Tarheel_Dem Apr 2014 #5
Bye! Starry Messenger Apr 2014 #6
SOMEBODY'S got to take out the trash....... socialist_n_TN Apr 2014 #7
Whenever "Obama" is in the subject line, the bat signal goes up. Starry Messenger Apr 2014 #8
... TBF Apr 2014 #9
I may be wrong, but this whole piece has a rather Neocon-ish, hawkish flavor. Jackpine Radical Apr 2014 #3
That's sorta what I got from it. Whatever it is, it is most definitely a hitpiece. n/t Tarheel_Dem Apr 2014 #4
People have opinions on the president - TBF Apr 2014 #10
Slate is a cultural magazine - TBF Apr 2014 #11
Yes, I got the same hit as you did.. 2banon Apr 2014 #17
The role of the last 70 years. yallerdawg Apr 2014 #12
Nice analysis - thanks. nt TBF Apr 2014 #13
The French yallerdawg Apr 2014 #14
The French have a history of being real bastards in many ways. Jackpine Radical Apr 2014 #15
LoL I had to wiki Bourdain....who knew, he's a graduate of the CIA.. (not that CIA) ;) 2banon Apr 2014 #20
This reads like a bloodthirsty Neo-Con rant, to me. 2banon Apr 2014 #16
Watching America has been around awhile and I have TBF Apr 2014 #18
thanks for the wiki background info... 2banon Apr 2014 #19
"Open minded thought" - TBF Apr 2014 #21
No reminders necessary as far as I'm concerned.. :) n/t 2banon Apr 2014 #22
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»The Collapse of Obama’s D...»Reply #16