Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
19. thanks for the wiki background info...
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 03:36 PM
Apr 2014

I was headed over there but as it so often happens, got distracted on other topics and didn't follow up.

It's interesting, we're hearing a lot of "voices" from outside of the U.S. (as well as internally) expressing extreme disappointment with Obama's "soft" approach to conflicts.. whether regarding Syria, to Iran, to the Crimea, Nigeria and on and on. we drone where we can get away with it, Pakistan, Yemen, Somali and elsewhere no doubt, which is absolutely unacceptable to many of us.

On the other hand Obama has so far refused to be baited into outright military interventions (vis a vis launching invasion/bombings/storm trooping) a lot of imperialistic talk, but no actual military attacks, which I applaud, but so many are salivating for him to do, here in the states and abroad.

What I think I'm reading and hearing, is a sort of bemoaning that the U.S. isn't behaving in it's traditional "exceptionalist" manner, and shame on us. it's been years since I've followed the Foreign Relations Council war hawks spouting off their policies and recommendations on anything. But as it happens, on the eve of the Crimea referendum, the sitting members of the panel on Leon Panetta's institute's conference were all practically sobbing, cued with Panetta's opening remarks "We Lost Crimea".

Hopefully I can be forgiven for any momentary lapse of open minded thought with regard to opinions which seem straight out of the mouths of William Kristol and his ilk.

Having said all that.. I DO really appreciate being made aware of an array of thought especially from out side the country.. it's important for many reasons, in seeking to further and broaden my understanding of divergence of world views.. And this is a website, I've never seen before, it appears that Noam Chomsky is featured in the archives.. so I look forward to exploring that place more..

oh yeah, regarding the "Blue Republican" logo, it does look like an ad on second view.. there's "Ending Left vs Right" meme attached. Interesting.

"Translated By Simon Wood". From what? Russian? Tarheel_Dem Apr 2014 #1
From Slate (France) - are you having trouble reading today? TBF Apr 2014 #2
Block me. Sounds like you guys need "protecting". Tarheel_Dem Apr 2014 #5
Bye! Starry Messenger Apr 2014 #6
SOMEBODY'S got to take out the trash....... socialist_n_TN Apr 2014 #7
Whenever "Obama" is in the subject line, the bat signal goes up. Starry Messenger Apr 2014 #8
... TBF Apr 2014 #9
I may be wrong, but this whole piece has a rather Neocon-ish, hawkish flavor. Jackpine Radical Apr 2014 #3
That's sorta what I got from it. Whatever it is, it is most definitely a hitpiece. n/t Tarheel_Dem Apr 2014 #4
People have opinions on the president - TBF Apr 2014 #10
Slate is a cultural magazine - TBF Apr 2014 #11
Yes, I got the same hit as you did.. 2banon Apr 2014 #17
The role of the last 70 years. yallerdawg Apr 2014 #12
Nice analysis - thanks. nt TBF Apr 2014 #13
The French yallerdawg Apr 2014 #14
The French have a history of being real bastards in many ways. Jackpine Radical Apr 2014 #15
LoL I had to wiki Bourdain....who knew, he's a graduate of the CIA.. (not that CIA) ;) 2banon Apr 2014 #20
This reads like a bloodthirsty Neo-Con rant, to me. 2banon Apr 2014 #16
Watching America has been around awhile and I have TBF Apr 2014 #18
thanks for the wiki background info... 2banon Apr 2014 #19
"Open minded thought" - TBF Apr 2014 #21
No reminders necessary as far as I'm concerned.. :) n/t 2banon Apr 2014 #22
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Socialist Progressives»The Collapse of Obama’s D...»Reply #19