Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Photography
In reply to the discussion: About Hello Kitty, the Eyes on You photo contest winner . . . [View all]AndyS
(14,559 posts)9. This is reminiscent of the discussions dating back to the early days of photography.
Is it art? Photographers have been pretty unanimous in saying Oh heck yeah! But traditionalists (and those working in other media) said no because it uses a mechanical device. Photogs came back with How's that different from using a hammer and chisel to create the David? Or brushes and oils to make a Starry Night?
Should I be criticized because I own $10,000 in equipment? If not, how is that different from using $100 software? Is it the creative eye? If so why limit the eye to what is before the lens and not the imagination behind the eye? 
*not my work.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I agree, in that, in my opinion at least, photo enhancing is fine when done to clean up
Ocelot II
Jul 2022
#5
This is reminiscent of the discussions dating back to the early days of photography.
AndyS
Jul 2022
#9
I think the question is where we draw the line (if we want to draw one) between
Ocelot II
Jul 2022
#21
This is the crux of why I started this thread. It IS the nature of art and the craft of image making
AndyS
Jul 2022
#22
I feel like you're replying to my posts without really absorbing what I'm saying.
ShazzieB
Jul 2022
#26
Shaz, I really do understand what you are saying and I've had a long time to consider
AndyS
Jul 2022
#28
I leave it to the folks who run the contest, but my own feeling is that this was not in the spirit
JudyM
Jul 2022
#25
I repeat, if the image appeals to you that's a good thing. If not I've failed be it
AndyS
Jul 2022
#40
All digital images have full information about the image embedded along with all the
AndyS
Jul 2022
#45
I think we've got two separate issues to debate. AndyS is a very good, professional
sinkingfeeling
Jul 2022
#47
My honest two cents worth, (I came in second place). EDITED FOR THE ORIGINAL PHOTO
Grumpy Old Guy
Jul 2022
#51
For comparison, here are the rules used by "Outdoor Photography" magazine
Grumpy Old Guy
Jul 2022
#52