Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AndyS

(14,559 posts)
9. Yes, there is definitely more detail in the 50mp image.
Mon Dec 12, 2022, 10:06 AM
Dec 2022

Still, even with your enlargement it doesn't come across all that well on a website. It's pretty obvious on a monitor in PS.

That said I took some measurements off my screen comparing the size of the enlargements vs original image. Extrapolating from that the enlargement would be about 50 inches on the long side. So unless the two images were printed to 50x40 the increase in definition wouldn't be visible unless we apply the 'sniff test' (when a photographer gets so close he smell the ink). Normal viewing distance for a picture that large is about 8-10 feet.

Because of the limitations of the human eye 10mp is ample unless severe cropping is necessary. Apple did a promotion for their camera phones by "printing" pictures on buildings. From a block away they looked great.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Photography»Full size images. One 20...»Reply #9