Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Major Nikon

(36,925 posts)
3. There are situations where zone focusing is actually far more effective than autofocus
Tue Nov 26, 2013, 10:48 AM
Nov 2013

For certain lenses I much prefer manual focus to autofocus lenses. The reason is because manual focus lenses are designed to focus manually (duh) which you might not think about, but you give up a few things on autofocus lenses when it comes to handling in manual focus operation. Autofocus lenses tend to have a short throw between the minimum focusing distance and infinity which makes precise manual focusing harder. They also don't have the same feel because you have the autofocus drive to contend with. You also usually don't get a DoF scale on the lens itself. With certain lenses I am almost never in autofocus mode, so to get a feature I never or rarely use, I've given up a lot in the handling department. Ultrawide and macro lenses are two examples I would never buy an autofocus lens for, unless other characteristics far outweigh what I'm losing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Photography»I picked up an Experiment...»Reply #3