Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Photography

In reply to the discussion: Opinions on lenses [View all]

Major Nikon

(36,925 posts)
12. The 55-200 is a good value
Sun May 11, 2014, 09:49 PM
May 2014

200mm is really the entry point for taking pictures of small animals at decent working distances, but even at that you need to be pretty close. The closer you are the less cropping you'll need to do and cropping robs you of effective sharpness pretty quickly.

The first thing I need to know is what Nikon body you have. The D3XXX and D5XXX series bodies will not autofocus with many Nikon lenses, particularly the older ones available on the used market. So if autofocus is important to you, look for AFS designated lenses in Nikon with either of those series bodies. 3rd party lens manufacturers have different designators, so you'll need to look for lenses with internal focusing motors.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/62788945@N08/sets/72157626572470855/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/62788945@N08/sets/72157626765431732/

The purposes of those tests is to show that at normal screen resolutions and no cropping, you're not going to notice much difference in sharpness between cheaper lenses and much more expensive ones. Where you really start to notice the difference is with very large prints or when you start cropping significantly.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Opinions on lenses [View all] ohheckyeah May 2014 OP
Here's a review of it jmowreader May 2014 #1
Thank you very much ohheckyeah May 2014 #14
I own both lenses Major Nikon May 2014 #2
Since sharpness is a main ohheckyeah May 2014 #4
Of the two the 55-200mm is the sharper. ManiacJoe May 2014 #7
I can get it ohheckyeah May 2014 #10
For the extra $150 price for new, you get a five year warranty. ManiacJoe May 2014 #11
The 55-200 is a good value Major Nikon May 2014 #12
Your links don't work. ohheckyeah May 2014 #13
You'll have to copy and paste the links Major Nikon May 2014 #15
I have the 18-200 and a 60 macro NV Whino May 2014 #3
I want as sharp as I can get. ohheckyeah May 2014 #5
This quote from SlrGear.com seems... ManiacJoe May 2014 #6
Why do you like the 70-300? ohheckyeah May 2014 #8
It is a little sharper than the 55-200mm ManiacJoe May 2014 #9
I decided to go with the 55-200 ohheckyeah May 2014 #16
The Nikkor 70-200/2.8 is an amazing piece of glass Major Nikon May 2014 #17
I wrote a reply to you and it ohheckyeah May 2014 #18
For the extension tubes, go with Kenko and go new, not used Major Nikon May 2014 #19
Will do. ohheckyeah May 2014 #20
I know I'm a bit late to the thread justiceischeap May 2014 #21
Thanks for the reply.... ohheckyeah May 2014 #22
Thanks! justiceischeap May 2014 #23
I found that out the hard way with the ohheckyeah May 2014 #24
Nope, it's probably in the 3.5 range. nt justiceischeap May 2014 #25
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Photography»Opinions on lenses»Reply #12