Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Photography

In reply to the discussion: Opinions on lenses [View all]

Major Nikon

(36,925 posts)
17. The Nikkor 70-200/2.8 is an amazing piece of glass
Mon May 12, 2014, 08:39 PM
May 2014

There are actually 2 different versions of it. I have the older first version. I decided not to upgrade when the 2nd version came out due to tradeoffs in handling issues with the 2nd version and the way I use this lens. Thom Hogan does a good review of the 2nd version, including what the differences are:

http://www.bythom.com/nikkor-70-200-VR-II-lens.htm

One thing you'll want to budget for is a good tripod, especially if you want to use this lens for nature photography. This is a big and heavy piece of glass and while it performs well while handholding or with a monopod, a good tripod is something you're almost certainly going to want. If you want to save some money on the tripod, look at the Bogen/Manfrotto 30XX tripods on the used market. You can find a lot of them on ebay. They are build like a tank and made to last forever. They are a lot heavier than carbon fiber, but you get all the stability at a fraction of the cost of a high end carbon fiber tripod.

http://photo.net/learn/nature/bogtri

Other accessories worth considering is a set of Kenko extension tubes (do NOT go with cheaper tubes with this lens). Extension tubes on a lens like this will allow you to focus much closer and explore the world of small creatures which will greatly increase the utility of this lens for nature photography. 2x teleconverters also work pretty well with this lens. I recommend the Kenko N-AF 2x Teleplus Pro 300. This one actually performs as well as my Nikon 2x teleconverters with this lens at a fraction of the cost. Just for fun I actually stacked stacked the Kenko 2x behind one of my Nikon 2x behind this lens (which I don't recommend for most photography) and took a picture of the moon. The results were surprisingly acceptable although certainly not spectacular.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/103612061#post17

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Opinions on lenses [View all] ohheckyeah May 2014 OP
Here's a review of it jmowreader May 2014 #1
Thank you very much ohheckyeah May 2014 #14
I own both lenses Major Nikon May 2014 #2
Since sharpness is a main ohheckyeah May 2014 #4
Of the two the 55-200mm is the sharper. ManiacJoe May 2014 #7
I can get it ohheckyeah May 2014 #10
For the extra $150 price for new, you get a five year warranty. ManiacJoe May 2014 #11
The 55-200 is a good value Major Nikon May 2014 #12
Your links don't work. ohheckyeah May 2014 #13
You'll have to copy and paste the links Major Nikon May 2014 #15
I have the 18-200 and a 60 macro NV Whino May 2014 #3
I want as sharp as I can get. ohheckyeah May 2014 #5
This quote from SlrGear.com seems... ManiacJoe May 2014 #6
Why do you like the 70-300? ohheckyeah May 2014 #8
It is a little sharper than the 55-200mm ManiacJoe May 2014 #9
I decided to go with the 55-200 ohheckyeah May 2014 #16
The Nikkor 70-200/2.8 is an amazing piece of glass Major Nikon May 2014 #17
I wrote a reply to you and it ohheckyeah May 2014 #18
For the extension tubes, go with Kenko and go new, not used Major Nikon May 2014 #19
Will do. ohheckyeah May 2014 #20
I know I'm a bit late to the thread justiceischeap May 2014 #21
Thanks for the reply.... ohheckyeah May 2014 #22
Thanks! justiceischeap May 2014 #23
I found that out the hard way with the ohheckyeah May 2014 #24
Nope, it's probably in the 3.5 range. nt justiceischeap May 2014 #25
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Photography»Opinions on lenses»Reply #17