Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Photography

(60,304 posts)

8. Here's a 1200X900. See if it screws up the page formatting.

Fri Nov 28, 2014, 09:29 PM

Nov 2014

It doesn't in Chrome.

900X1200 would mean scrolling to see the whole image.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Can we discuss the 800 pixel limit for posting images? [View all] groundloop Nov 2014 OP

I think we discussed it some time back and it didn't go anywhere Major Nikon Nov 2014 #1

that must have been quite some time ago.... groundloop Nov 2014 #2

Feb 2013 Major Nikon Nov 2014 #4

huh.... somehow I totally forgot about that... groundloop Nov 2014 #5

I honestly don't even think about it any more NV Whino Nov 2014 #3

That's what I do, too. Blue_In_AK Nov 2014 #6

I do that too. CaliforniaPeggy Nov 2014 #7

Here's a 1200X900. See if it screws up the page formatting. alfredo Nov 2014 #8

The wonderdog fits perfectly at 1200x900 Adsos Letter Nov 2014 #9

I think another issue is bandwidth. Are we putting more alfredo Nov 2014 #11

No burden on DU's servers. ManiacJoe Nov 2014 #14

Actually, that shot is 800x600. ManiacJoe Nov 2014 #13

Inspect element says 1024X768 opened in new tab alfredo Nov 2014 #16

Yes, the pic alone in a new tab is large. ManiacJoe Nov 2014 #17

So it has been decided, stay with 800X600. :) alfredo Nov 2014 #18

The size limitations are only CC Nov 2014 #10

The 1200X900 is fine on my iPad. I don't know about phones. alfredo Nov 2014 #12