Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
6. I'll add to what I said above-- I had a functioning darkroom years ago and...
Sat Apr 4, 2020, 08:01 PM
Apr 2020

did my own developing and printing. Mostly B&W, but some color. Color was largely formulaic, and you couldn't really make the subtle changes like you can do with B&W.

Even did my own Type C Color and Ektachrome, but rarely worth the trouble. Kodachrome has to be done by a lab because the couplers aren't in the film and have to be added during processing. Carefully.

Bought 100' foot rolls of Tri-X and loaded my own cartridges. Shot like you shoot digital nowadays and threw away 90% of the stuff. I used a stock Kodak developer DK-50 and tried making it from scratch, but wasn't worth the trouble. I did make my own paper developer-- a two bath developer where you started making a boldly contrasty print (On low-contrast paper) and then moved it into a less contrasty solution to fill in the gaps. It extended the tonal range of the print way beyond anything you would imagine.

Then, some of them I had printed to 30x40 matte paper and hand colored them with Marshall's oils. Sold a bunch of those.

Moving up to 6x6 film made everything even nicer in B&W. Never got the Hasselblads I drooled over, but can't imagine how much better they would have been than my Minolta C-330.

On edit-- Panatomic X was incredible. Absolutely no grain if you did it right.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Photography»I like the Olympus camera...»Reply #6