Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Brother Buzz

(39,946 posts)
4. That event was reported over a year ago
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 06:40 PM
Jul 2015

That Gizmodo link is totally unreadable on my computer so I don't know how much of it is being repeated, but here's a story about it from last year:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024861414

And another story from a local publication also from 2014:


Burial ground discovered, paved over for new development


by Danielle Chemtob on May 1, 2014


As the greenhouses that used to line Doherty Drive have been uprooted to pave way for a suburban development called Rose Lane, archaeological excavations have revealed that the location of the soon-to-be 85-residence community is actually the former site of a much older community—one that, over 4,000 years ago, may have been home to a productive Coastal Miwok village.
The Rose Lane development along Doherty Drive sits atop the former location of a Native American burial ground rich in artifacts.

The Rose Lane development along Doherty Drive sits atop the former location of a Native American burial ground rich in artifacts.

Around 600 Native American human remains, as well a condor burial and a bear burial, obsidian, grinding stones, shell beads, ancient spears-throwers called atlatls that predated the bow and arrow, and other artifacts, the oldest levels of which date to about 4,500 years ago—older than King Tut’s tomb—have been uncovered in a shellmound, or an artificial mound created by humans, underneath the Rose Lane development, according to Jelmer W. Eerkens, a professor of anthropology at UC Davis who visited the site.

The remains and artifacts were analyzed by archaeologists and then reburied in an undisclosed on-site location according to the wishes of the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria, who were determined to be the most likely descendants of the Coastal Miwok, although no actual DNA testing was allowed to be conducted.

However, Eerkens believes that the archaeologists’ wishes were not honored, and that they were not given enough time to investigate the site, and that because of the rarity of sites as old and large as this one, it is a loss to the archaeological community that further analysis was not done.

<more>

http://redwoodbark.org/2014/05/native-american-burial-ground-discovered-under-local-development-2/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Rare Indian Burial Ground...»Reply #4