Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
California
In reply to the discussion: Harris or Sanchez? [View all]Auggie
(33,331 posts)25. FYI: Thompson is a Blue Dog, and Dodd is a well-connected former Republican
They're both my reps too, and while Thompson got my primary vote for lack of any alternative, I voted for Mariko Yamada over Dodd. Yamada is a true dem and progressive and not part of the local oligarchy (yet). I didn't vote for Aguiar-Curry in the primary but I'll have to in the general election. It's either her or Schaupp, the Republican (yuck). That Assembly race bewteen Wolk and Aguiar-Curry got real ugly with all the special interest money pouring in:
This years Assembly race, particularly the last month and a half, was marked by the extraordinary influx of special-interest money funding Aguiar-Currys campaign.
Independent expenditures on her behalf totaled $2.5 million, second in the state only to those spent on Dodds Senate campaign.
Special-interest groups, primarily charter-school proponents, oil companies and Realtors, poured money into Aguiar-Currys campaign at a rate never seen before in a local Assembly race. Schaupp noted Tuesday evening that the amount of money spent for each vote he received this year was about 75 cents. For Aguiar-Curry, he said, $160 per vote.
Most of that money was not spent by Aguiar-Curry herself; rather, it was spent by independent expenditure committees over which candidates have no control. That money paid for mailers, phone calls, radio and television ads, social media promotions and more, all of which made Aguiar-Curry a household name in a way none of her opponents could match.
Independent expenditures on her behalf totaled $2.5 million, second in the state only to those spent on Dodds Senate campaign.
Special-interest groups, primarily charter-school proponents, oil companies and Realtors, poured money into Aguiar-Currys campaign at a rate never seen before in a local Assembly race. Schaupp noted Tuesday evening that the amount of money spent for each vote he received this year was about 75 cents. For Aguiar-Curry, he said, $160 per vote.
Most of that money was not spent by Aguiar-Curry herself; rather, it was spent by independent expenditure committees over which candidates have no control. That money paid for mailers, phone calls, radio and television ads, social media promotions and more, all of which made Aguiar-Curry a household name in a way none of her opponents could match.
http://www.davisenterprise.com/local-news/schaupp-aguiar-curry-take-top-spots-in-assembly-primary/
I'll vote Kamala Harris for senate.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
We need Sanchez to stay in her House seat; she's managed to keep it blue in very red Orange County.
SunSeeker
May 2016
#10
I don't vote for elected officials to high office with no legislative record.
JonLeibowitz
Jun 2016
#18
Interesting, anywhere to read up on this for the fall? I might vote for her in November then
JonLeibowitz
Jun 2016
#22
I used the word incorrectly. I meant it doesn't matter because she has already won.
still_one
Jun 2016
#32
Got it! :-) Although they're still counting the ballots (despite all ballots already having come in
BlueCaliDem
Jun 2016
#33
FYI, I also voted for Harris, and I agree with you, I don't see the final result changing
still_one
Jun 2016
#34