Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(127,265 posts)
2. I have a mixture of feelings about the seizures myself.
Tue Aug 16, 2016, 11:57 PM
Aug 2016

I agree that the proceeds that financial gains that are a direct result of illegal activity are fair game; specifically, anyone carrying large amounts of cash (six figure amounts) while also trafficking contraband. I also believe that certain items of property can also be seized if it is apparent that they could not have been purchased without the involvement of illegal activity (expensive vehicles and homes over $500k). However, I am in agreement that property such as a modest value vehicle or home that were purchased as a result of hard work or if they are jointly purchased constitutes an unjust seizure. Therefore, the seizure laws should provide a deterrent to criminal activity, but the enforcement of those laws should be done judiciously to avoid situations like those mentioned in your post.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»California moves to curb ...»Reply #2