Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

California

Iwillnevergiveup

(9,298 posts)

6. For what it's worth

Reply to Le Taz Hot (Original post)

Sun Oct 7, 2012, 11:30 PM

Oct 2012

The Chamber of Commerce recommends a "NO" vote on Prop 37.

Progressive Christians Uniting, California Council of Churches, Unitarian Universalist Legislative Ministry in CA, Friends Committee on Legislation of CA, CA League of Conservation Voters, the League of Women Voters and the CA Labor Federation, AFL-CIO recommend a YES vote.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No on 37 Forced to Pull TV Ad . . . [View all] Le Taz Hot Oct 2012 OP

Keep hearing the radio ads those sleazy fucks are putting out, "with major funding by Monsanto" villager Oct 2012 #1

I thought there was something bogus about that ad tularetom Oct 2012 #2

That would be the ad that claims "meat for dog food must be labeled, but not meat for humans"? KamaAina Oct 2012 #3

ohhhh, THAT ad! SoapBox Oct 2012 #4

Reality check: Anti-Proposition 37 ad is partially misleading Zorro Oct 2012 #5

For what it's worth Iwillnevergiveup Oct 2012 #6

The No ads are so misleading. Like the one where they show dog food vs a steak. IndyJones Oct 2012 #7