Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. And, like the sudden flood of people who NEED support dogs - this proviso -
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 10:28 AM
Oct 2014
"so long as the pet can be reasonably accommodated, is well behaved and the tenant takes responsibility for property damage"
will be subverted. Requiring much larger security deposits may be called discriminatory, and yeah, I once lived in an apartment building with a No Dog policy, and the barking and smells and poop outside the building were so annoying/sickening that I moved out.
I reported the woman downstairs for her dog that yapped all day and all night, and nothing happened.
When she moved out, she glued the collection of carpet pieces that her dog ripped out down on to the floor, and it took the landlord quite a while to scrape everything up so the smelly carpet could be replaced.
The apartment upstairs - Saint Bernard that walked around all night.
Management said it was too much trouble getting tenants out after the lease was signed.
I never lived in an apartment again.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Berkeley considers outlaw...»Reply #1