Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

simak

(116 posts)
4. Yep. Natl Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
Thu Nov 6, 2014, 07:23 PM
Nov 2014

Once the compact has the necessary number of votes, there's a schedule for becoming active. It has to be active by a certain date, or it won't take effect till the next election. Likewise, states must exit the compact by a certain date or they will be considered committed to an upcoming election.

The compact guarantees that the popular candidate gets at least 270 electoral votes. This usually happens anyway, but there have been a few exceptions, notably Gore v Bush. The compact prevents that from happening again.

All previous occurrences have resulted in a Republican winning the electoral college even though a Democrat won the popular. So your example, Jeb Bush, is more likely to lose because of the compact than to win.

However, if a state does have its electors go to the candidate who lost its own popular vote as a result of the compact, don't be surprised to see them exit the compact before the next election. I expect the compact will collapse after one election.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I would think it would be popular vote by state NV Whino Nov 2014 #1
It wouldn't go into effect until all the states that sign on add up to 270 electoral votes. Make7 Nov 2014 #2
OK, I see that now. Le Taz Hot Nov 2014 #3
Yep. Natl Popular Vote Interstate Compact. simak Nov 2014 #4
Thank you for the clarification. Le Taz Hot Nov 2014 #6
It's news to me! WTF is the advantage here? arcane1 Nov 2014 #5
No, national vote. If most **people** in the US vote for the Dem (and most do), valerief Nov 2014 #7
Right, but that could be someone who lost CA but won the national. arcane1 Nov 2014 #10
If you're a progressive, I wouldn't worry. I think most **people** vote Dem. valerief Nov 2014 #11
The Cali vote, which is sizeable, would contribute to the national total underpants Nov 2014 #15
I didn't know about it either ... Auggie Nov 2014 #8
Even though it's not close to Le Taz Hot Nov 2014 #9
But the OP says the POPULAR vote has to be NATIONAL, not state. valerief Nov 2014 #12
Well, the way I'm reading this Le Taz Hot Nov 2014 #14
Read all about it: Auggie Nov 2014 #20
Thanks, old but I didn't know it either dreamnightwind Nov 2014 #13
I did not know this. oldandhappy Nov 2014 #16
We're actually not doing it yet. Le Taz Hot Nov 2014 #17
wow Bigger than I understood. wow oldandhappy Nov 2014 #18
how about just getting rid of the damned electoral college? niyad Nov 2014 #19
I didn't know... SoapBox Nov 2014 #21
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Am I Like the Last Person...»Reply #4