Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
4. No, the subsidy was to maintain the pyramid...
Sat Aug 10, 2013, 12:07 PM
Aug 2013

in useable condition, and low rents for the tenants. Even if the pier approach is replaced, the subsidy would still be required for the pyramid.
With the Vinoy open, and resturants and stores booming on Beach Drive (without subsidies), there simply is no longer a need to have subsidized businesses at the pier. To reconfigure the pyramid for other use would just drive up the cost further. Although it hasn't been discussed, it's quite likely the current location isn't even the best for a new pier.
And the proposed landside site for the Colombia resturant is not included in the Lens cost because the Colombia will pay for the construction. The city is not paying for that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Florida»Politifact- St. Petersbur...»Reply #4