Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Idaho

yonder

(9,664 posts)

3. Study after study and the result remains the same.

Reply to TexasTowelie (Original post)

Mon Nov 30, 2020, 02:16 PM

Nov 2020

The pro-impoundment interests will hang their hats on this and others that favor their POV while our side does the same which results in no change to declining runs.

I say remove the 4 non-essential lower Snake dams and start from there.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This new study challenges scientists who blame dams for decline of Snake River salmon [View all] TexasTowelie Nov 2020 OP

Since it's funded by BPA the study will be immediately discounted captain queeg Nov 2020 #1

Doesn't make sense... 2naSalit Nov 2020 #2

Study after study and the result remains the same. yonder Nov 2020 #3