Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(128,150 posts)
6. The victim shouldn't have to sue
Sun Apr 1, 2018, 11:33 PM
Apr 2018

because the attacker committed a criminal act. If a judgment is rendered then it could require restitution as a financial penalty. However, I don't believe that the victim could receive restitution for an act of mental anguish in a criminal case (I'm certain that an attorney here will correct me if I'm wrong).

The civil lawsuit was filed against the hospital since they are the "deep pockets". In theory and depending on the jurisdiction, if the plaintiffs can prove that the hospital was joint and severally liable (such as inadequate security) then they could have to pay the entire court award even though the hospital may only be minimally at fault. Because of that risk, the hospital does have an incentive to pay the claim rather than to mount a costly defense.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Michigan»Woman wearing hijab attac...»Reply #6