Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
6. Doesn't the current law require that the insurance companies
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 09:35 PM
Sep 2013

pay out a specific large percentage of their income for actual health care? And if they collect more than that they have to refund the excess?

Not that I'm a huge fan of the insurance companies mind you. I look forward to Medicare For All in the foreseeable future.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

it's only tangentially hoped to be affordable.... mike_c Sep 2013 #1
Which is why I often refer to as dflprincess Sep 2013 #2
Thank your stars you aren't in my shoes. You'd be singing a different tune. NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #14
I have been in your situation dflprincess Sep 2013 #16
I have to admit that I didn't check your state's rates, I checked my own. NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #17
And I did not check New York's rates- I imagine they would be higher than Minnesota's dflprincess Sep 2013 #19
Doesn't the current law require that the insurance companies SheilaT Sep 2013 #6
have we forgotten the subsidies? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #3
Once a single person has an adjusted income of $46,000 they are not eligible for subsidies. n/t dflprincess Sep 2013 #7
$782/mo, with only a $2500 deductible at age 60, no pre-existing, etc., sounds decent. Hoyt Sep 2013 #4
Much of what we call preventive care are actually screening tests dflprincess Sep 2013 #8
Holy crap. I thought COBRA was bad. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2013 #5
COBRA is worse than that... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #9
It wasn't for me. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2013 #10
5 yrs ago I was offered health insurance at a company... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #11
No, female. But until I retired I worked for a very large corporation The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2013 #12
Minnesota has not allowed different rates for men and women for many years. n/t dflprincess Sep 2013 #13
I was too, three years ago, then I was rehired and left and it costs $1,432.49/month for just me. NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #15
This is something I don't understand about health insurance vs other kinds of insurance dflprincess Sep 2013 #18
I'm a current MCHA holder geardaddy Sep 2013 #20
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Minnesota»So I was playing with the...»Reply #6