Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Minnesota

(29,281 posts)

2. Does this mean we'll have to vote on another Consitutional amendment?

Mon Mar 5, 2012, 10:28 PM

Mar 2012

Thank God Mark has a spine unlike the DFLers in the legislature who voted for this.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Oh thank goodness Dayton vetoed "castle doctrine". [View all] glinda Mar 2012 OP

A governor shows some sense on this type legislation. Hoyt Mar 2012 #1

Does this mean we'll have to vote on another Consitutional amendment? dflprincess Mar 2012 #2

Do we know yet who voted for it on the Dem side? glinda Mar 2012 #3

Good for the Governor! Morning Dew Mar 2012 #4

Good job, Governor Dayton! MineralMan Mar 2012 #5