Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mister Ed

(7,002 posts)
2. I'd say it's not quite that cut-and-dried with White Bear Lake.
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 02:57 PM
Aug 2015

I'm an old White Bear boy, and know quite a few lakeshore homeowners personally. Many are Democrats. One who springs to mind is a very hardworking, dedicated local peace activist.

The lake is unlike other local lakes in that it's fed mostly by springs, and not runoff. I think the problem is that permits to draw water from the underlying aquifer have been handed out quite freely to developers over the years. In some cases, the water has even been used to create small artificial lakes to enhance new developments. As the water level in the aquifer has dropped, the springs that used to feed the lake may at times act as drains instead.

The result is that the lake's level has dropped about six feet. One family I know has seen their shoreline recede about 300 feet from where it once was. That represents quite a loss, both in quality of life and in property value.

If the DNR has allowed wealth to be transferred in this way from the lakeshore homeowners to the real-estate developers, then I think state aid may be appropriate, just as it is to the Mille Lacs resort owners.




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Minnesota»"Government exists t...»Reply #2