Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mister Ed

(7,002 posts)
4. Much more to it than property values, I think.
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 01:12 PM
Aug 2015

White Bear Lake is a tremendous, publicly-held asset. It's by far the best recreational lake in the East Metro, and it's used freely by all. A public asset like that needs to be protected and preserved by our governmental agencies.

If it's at all practical and feasible to restore the lake at this point, then it should be restored. It's a very thorny problem, though, and I'm sure no one in government wants to own it. It may be that the only way to compel the government to address the issue is through a lawsuit. I just hope that doesn't mean that a lot of taxpayer dollars will be spent on legal costs when they could be spent serving the public.

Returning to the topic of property values, though: if your neighbors were literally under water - if, for example, their backyards were now partially flooded due to shortsighted and greedy governmental policies - then I very much hope they would sue for redress, rather than just accepting the loss.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Minnesota»"Government exists t...»Reply #4