HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Places » U.S. » Oregon (Group) » Oregon looks at per-mile ... » Reply #12

Response to Shankapotomus (Original post)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 10:52 PM

12. this seems like an easily-solved problem

Problem: highly efficient vehicles don't pay as much for road upkeep in per-gallon gasoline taxes to directly support road maintenance
Solution: as the gasoline tax revenues decrease, compensate with higher income taxes and use more general funds for road maintenance

- The income tax is one of the few halfway progressive taxes we have.
- I sure as hell don't want to discourage people from purchasing or benefitting from high-efficiency vehicles.
- A per-mile tax may seem like a good idea, but it disproportionately affects lower-income individuals who must commute long distances and may still be paying the high gas taxes on an inefficient vehicle they can't afford to replace.

Usage taxes tend to be regressive. I'm not a fan.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 14 replies Author Time Post
Shankapotomus Jan 2013 OP
Maven Jan 2013 #1
Shankapotomus Jan 2013 #2
ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #3
Shankapotomus Jan 2013 #4
RickFromMN Jan 2013 #5
Bluenorthwest Jan 2013 #6
RickFromMN Jan 2013 #8
aardvark401 Jan 2013 #7
RickFromMN Jan 2013 #9
thetonka Jan 2013 #10
davidpdx Feb 2013 #11
LineNew Reply this seems like an easily-solved problem
0rganism Feb 2013 #12
Shankapotomus Feb 2013 #13
0rganism Feb 2013 #14
Please login to view edit histories.