Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(170,866 posts)
13. Sam Wang and Princeton Consortium response to the map
Tue Feb 20, 2018, 09:19 AM
Feb 2018
Introducing the new Pennsylvania Congressional map
February 19th, 2018, 3:20pm by Sam Wang



Here’s the new Congressional map for Pennsylvania, drawn by the special master. It splits 13 counties, less than any plan offered to the court. The only plan that splits fewer counties is the “compact D gerrymander” that the Princeton Gerrymandering Project posted over the weekend. Our plan scores comparably to or better than the special master’s plan on the metrics the court set out (fewer county and municipality splits, performs just as well on compactness metrics).

As we showed over the weekend, it is just possible within the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s rules to allow a plan that reaches partisan balance, i.e. a 9 D, 9 R outcome for a 50-50 statewide vote. However, those rules bias the range of possibilities in favor of Republicans, so that a Republican gerrymander – one of the proposals on the table – was also a possibility.

It appears as if the special master was trying to achieve partisan balance (as opposed to, say, picking a plan that was in the middle of the range of possible maps). His map – and the one we gave over the weekend – show that even under the constraint of compactness and not splitting political jurisdictions, it is still possible to undo the effects of population clustering. Notably, he did so while keeping most population centers together.

It now seems clear that the Pennsylvania GOP made a serious tactical error. The governor and Democratic legislators had offered a plan that would have retained some GOP advantage. The new plan erases that advantage entirely. In our analysis, based on the 2016 vote the new map produces 5 Democratic districts, 7 Republican districts, and 6 tossup districts. The maximum likely performance by Democrats in 2018 would be 11 seats, a gain of 6 seats over their current representation. That gain would be one-fourth of the 24 seats they need to win control of the House of Representatives. Of course, some of those gains could also go away in a later year that was good for Republicans. That’s the point of electoral competition.

http://election.princeton.edu/2018/02/19/introducing-the-new-pennsylvania-congressional-map/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The new map graphic DeminPennswoods Feb 2018 #1
Thanks! BumRushDaShow Feb 2018 #2
I was just going to post the PG link DeminPennswoods Feb 2018 #5
Looks pretty good to me DeminPennswoods Feb 2018 #3
From my twitter feed Gothmog Feb 2018 #4
Oh, Crud! MyOwnPeace Feb 2018 #6
Where are these districts that are supposed to benefit democrats? femmocrat Feb 2018 #7
Dems will have a chance now DeminPennswoods Feb 2018 #8
I found that the 4 counties in the new PA-14 BumRushDaShow Feb 2018 #11
And the GOP is vowing court action to stop it. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2018 #9
Yup BumRushDaShow Feb 2018 #10
Some interesting analysis has been going regarding potentials for this map BumRushDaShow Feb 2018 #12
No third party/independent votes considered in these stats FakeNoose Feb 2018 #14
Well statistically BumRushDaShow Feb 2018 #15
Sam Wang and Princeton Consortium response to the map BumRushDaShow Feb 2018 #13
How about that, our "uneducated guesses" were pretty close DeminPennswoods Feb 2018 #16
Well what happened was BumRushDaShow Feb 2018 #17
Yep, LV and Lancaster DeminPennswoods Feb 2018 #18
I keep forgetting about Altoona! BumRushDaShow Feb 2018 #19
It's a bit jarring to look at a couple of the CDs and DeminPennswoods Feb 2018 #20
It's funny that I didn't even look at the legend and what it represented BumRushDaShow Feb 2018 #21
Old CD 5 contains the Allegheny Natl Forest DeminPennswoods Feb 2018 #22
You can see a dark strip going from NW to SE in Philly BumRushDaShow Feb 2018 #23
Once travelling across the PA Tpk, traffic was forced to detour DeminPennswoods Feb 2018 #24
That sounded like when me and my sis took my niece to Crystal Cave BumRushDaShow Feb 2018 #25
Predictably, the Post-Gazette editorial team sided DeminPennswoods Feb 2018 #26
Links to history of PA redistricting lawsuits wrt 2010 map DeminPennswoods Feb 2018 #27
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Pennsylvania»BREAKING: PA Supreme Cour...»Reply #13