Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pennsylvania

JPZenger

(6,819 posts)

3. I think the case may have skipped county court

Reply to Divernan (Reply #2)

Mon Mar 9, 2015, 09:21 PM

Mar 2015

I'm not an attorney, but I believe the one link might infer that the case may have gone right to the Commonwealth Court, and skipped the county court. The county court (through the orphans court judge) does have authority over charities.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Pa. Sup. Ct. hears case of illegal diversion of charity $. Refuses to release name of the charity. [View all] JPZenger Mar 2015 OP

I think you are on to something. Curmudgeoness Mar 2015 #1

I'm a PA atty. & have never heard of Redacted v. Redacted on any case. Divernan Mar 2015 #2

I think the case may have skipped county court JPZenger Mar 2015 #3

PA courts: leading the way in preferential treatment of the One Percent Divernan Mar 2015 #6

They weren't even going to release the fact that there was a case JPZenger Mar 2015 #4

On a completely unrelated matter, here is an unredacted legal argument about the Hershey Trust JPZenger Mar 2015 #5