Washington
In reply to the discussion: Sanders is Rocking The Dem Base heading in to the WA State Caucus!!!! [View all]stevenleser
(32,886 posts)I alerted on the results so that admins can see that someone did not vote to hide something that should have been an obvious slam dunk:
On Fri Mar 18, 2016, 01:50 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Stop backing Shillary!!!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1082&pid=5066
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
'Shillary"? A criminal? For pity's sake!
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Mar 18, 2016, 02:02 PM, and the Jury voted 6-1 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: She's under investigation from the FBI. Nothing has been proven yet. Until that happens, calling her a criminal is unwarranted.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This post is over the top - for clarity, though I support Clinton, I would vote the same way if this was said of Sanders. You just don't post this kind of stuff aout our candidates. This vindictiveness on both sides has to stop.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: That was the easiest decision to make.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: While calling Clinton Shillary and a criminal isn't very cool, it's not unheard of on DU and certainly is on par with some of the vitriol I read directed towards Sanders. I'd be more swayed to hide it as an off-topic response for the post, but that's being policed by a member in the thread.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.