Washington

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)

24. Hypocritical? Son, I don't believe the world has a projector as big as yours

Sat Apr 16, 2016, 11:36 PM

Apr 2016

You're the ones constantly harping on phantom DNC bias. Every time Sanders doesn't get every little tantrum of his immediately attended to, you think it simply must be because the DNC chair is nefariously making two million more people vote for Clinton. Somehow. In some unexplained fashion.

Long lines in Arizona? In minority districts? Set up by the Republicans? Where people don't have time to sit around like personality cult fanatics waiting to vote? In short, a system set up naturally biased to Sanders strengths (minorities of fanatic, disproportionately white, non-Democrats) and against Clinton (majorities of Democrats who actually look like Democrats)? Why, that must be a conspiracy against Sanders! And Hillary must be involved. Because reasons! And therefore!!

Oh, but when it comes right down to abusing the process, you're all in favor of it. So long as your guy wins.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

58 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Shenanigans from DNC ahead of Legislative District caucuses [View all] Flying Squirrel Apr 2016 OP

...... daleanime Apr 2016 #1

It is to be expected, "it's all she seems to do" /nt Dragonfli Apr 2016 #7

In Colorado the Sanders supporters moved into every slot possible at every level SoLeftIAmRight Apr 2016 #13

That was reported as a good thing by a Sanders supporter the other day Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2016 #2

Question, since you are also a delegate rpannier Apr 2016 #12

No it doesn't work that way Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2016 #14

I didn't report it as a "good thing" pugetres Apr 2016 #29

Her "supporters" couldn't even be bothered to show up to caucus Scootaloo Apr 2016 #3

It seems the rules are set in stone... malokvale77 Apr 2016 #4

The rules are the rules... DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #31

Just so wrong! redwitch Apr 2016 #5

Just like the good old days of Tammany Hall, the DLC getting back to the earlier roots of the party Dragonfli Apr 2016 #6

yep 840high Apr 2016 #10

Another word for changing the rules Geronimoe Apr 2016 #8

The DNC called our home and acknowledged my husband was a Delegate glinda Apr 2016 #30

Liars gotta Lie... ConsiderThis_2016 Apr 2016 #9

Chicken shit action by the DNC but not surprising, Autumn Apr 2016 #11

Fuck the DNC Bubzer Apr 2016 #15

More Clinton corruption. polichick Apr 2016 #16

Plus one for truth! Enthusiast Apr 2016 #43

You mean PREVENTION of shennanigans. PREVENTION of Sanders corruption. ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2016 #17

Beyond Ridiculous billhicks76 Apr 2016 #20

Hypocritical? Son, I don't believe the world has a projector as big as yours ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2016 #24

At One Time It Would Have Been An OxyMoron PCPrincess Apr 2016 #25

Enjoy your games son. TM99 Apr 2016 #32

Don't lie to me, child ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2016 #37

This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 Apr 2016 #38

You deserve a reply TM99 Apr 2016 #42

I'm not the one threatening to not vote for the Democratic nominee ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2016 #49

23% are registered Dems. Let's parse that out further. Divernan Apr 2016 #45

And 50% of Clinton voters weren't going to vote for Obama in 2008 ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2016 #50

I am a Bernie supporter who really does not like Hillary. JDPriestly Apr 2016 #41

So you can bash Hillary, but we can't point out hypocrisies... ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2016 #48

Just shut up. gregcrawford Apr 2016 #21

Wow #FeelTheMeltdown Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2016 #18

+1! 2naSalit Apr 2016 #22

This message was self-deleted by its author billhicks76 Apr 2016 #19

I'm an alternate delegate in Eastern WA for Bernie. hoosierspud Apr 2016 #23

Protect the lackluster! dchill Apr 2016 #26

What are you talking about tomorrow? The State convention isn't until June. nm rhett o rick Apr 2016 #27

Legislative District caucuses are tomorrow Mike__M Apr 2016 #34

Please! That rule will benefit the candidate whose delegates are most likely to SHOW UP!! eridani Apr 2016 #28

This seems like a reasonable rule to me, since it reflects the will of Blue Meany Apr 2016 #33

My sister is an alternate For LD 32 montanacowboy Apr 2016 #35

How do you spell C O R R U P T???!!!! KPN Apr 2016 #36

We have a corrupt system in the Democratic Party. This has to change NOW! highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #39

If you can, please report back on how many of her delegates don't show and how often this rule JDPriestly Apr 2016 #40

I don't mind this rule change, it's fair pengu Apr 2016 #44

How is it fair? Debie Wasserman INdemo Apr 2016 #47

Yep...Debbie Wasserman Schultz is the Kathlen Harris INdemo Apr 2016 #46

+1 the fix is in. Matt_R Apr 2016 #52

Th certainly are working hard to elect trump or cruz onecaliberal Apr 2016 #51

The DNC is trying to sway the election felix_numinous Apr 2016 #53

Changing rules in the middle... I see... mmkay... cui bono Apr 2016 #54

Just returned from my Legislative District Caucus Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2016 #55

Just returned a while ago from my own LD caucus. pugetres Apr 2016 #56

We voted on this at my LD caucus. I have to wonder though if the results where liberal_at_heart Apr 2016 #57

This came from the state party and not the DNC eridani Apr 2016 #58